90% of His Coding Agent's Rework Came From His Own Work Orders: A $0.07 "Falsifier" Pass Catches the Ambiguity First
- Level Advanced
- Setup1–3 hrs (estimated)
- Evidence Some evidence
- CostNot stated in source
- No-codeNo
What they did
A developer reviewed 61 must-fix items from his coding agents and traced 55 of them (90%) to work orders he wrote that were silent or ambiguous. He added a "falsifier" step: before the agent builds, a cheaper model (Sonnet) tries to find ways the work order could be misread. Each pass cost about $0.07 and 34 seconds, and in two runs it caught 60% and 56% of the problems (71% across both).
How it went
dev.to post by lizhuojunx86 (Oct 29, 2026): 61 must-fix items, 55 (90%) traced to silent or ambiguous work orders; falsifier pass on Sonnet about $0.07 and 34s; caught 60% and 56% (71% combined). Also uses MiMo; one developer's logs
Worth knowing
- dev.to post by lizhuojunx86 (Oct 29, 2026): 61 must-fix items, 55 (90%) traced to silent or ambiguous work orders; falsifier pass on Sonnet about $0.07 and 34s; caught 60% and 56% (71% combined). Also uses MiMo; one developer's logs.
Prompt
Cleaned version rewritten from the source — not a direct quote.
Before you write any code, act as a falsifier for this work order: [paste]. List every place it's silent or could be read two ways, every assumption you'd have to make, and what you'd build under each reading. Ask me to resolve each one. Only start building after I've answered.
Recommended
Try it in Grok Bot
- Copy the prompt (button below).
- Open Grok Bot chat and paste it. Replace any [bracketed] placeholders.
- Connect the listed tools (as needed) as connectors when Grok Bot asks.
- If the task repeats, ask: "Make this a daily routine."
Alternatives: the same prompt works in Claude Code, Claude, ChatGPT Agent, OpenClaw.
Set it up
Stack: Claude Code
- Read the original source for full context.
- Connect the tools your agent needs.
- Paste the prompt and replace [bracketed] placeholders.
- Run once manually and check the output before scheduling it.
Generic suggested steps, not from the source.
Evidence
dev.to post by lizhuojunx86 (Oct 29, 2026): 61 must-fix items, 55 (90%) traced to silent or ambiguous work orders; falsifier pass on Sonnet about $0.07 and 34s; caught 60% and 56% (71% combined). Also uses MiMo; one developer's logs
Source: Web · 2026-10-29 · Verified by us: not yet · Report broken or outdated